Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JAMES, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by TRETHOWAN, W. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JAMES, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by TRETHOWAN, W. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1989;39:61-64
© 1989 Society of Occupational Medicine


research-article

A Review of 132 Consecutive Patients Referred for Assessment of Vibration White Finger

C. A. JAMES, T. C. AW, J. M. HARRINGTON and W. N. TRETHOWAN

Medical Faculty, University of Birmingham
Institute of Occupational Health Birmingham

One hundred and thirty-two subjects were referred to the Insitute of Occupational Health in Birmingham over a 2 year period for assessment as to whether they met the criteria for Prescribed Disease A11 (vibration white finger). A standardized questionnaire and checklist was used, and each patient with vibration white finger was staged according to the Taylor and Pelmear (1975) classification. One hundred and sixteen subjects (88 per cent) had a clinical picture consistent with a diagnosis of vibration white finger, of which 10 did not meet the DHSS criteria for prescription. For these 116 subjects, the mean age at initial occupational exposure to vibration was 27 years. The mean age when symptoms began was 40 years. Numbness was the most common symptom accompanying the periodic blanching. More claimants reported symptoms affecting their hobbies and social life than affecting their work. The main job activities that exposed these claimants to vibration were pedestal grinding, pneumatic chipping/grinding, and hand grinding. Different systems available for staging vibration white finger have inherent limitations, but a scheme that uses standardized objective tests will make the diagnosis and assessment less reliant on subjective symptoms alone.


Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Dr T. C. Aw, Institute of Occupational Health, University of Birmingham, P.O. Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.