Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braddick, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Aw, T.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braddick, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Aw, T.-C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1992;42:36-38
© 1992 Society of Occupational Medicine

research-article

Audit of pre-employment health assessment in the National Health Service

M. R. Braddick, C. P. Atwell and Tar-Ching Aw

Department of Public Health Medicine, Central Birmingham Health Authority Birmingham, UK
Institute of Occupational Health Birmingham, UK

Seventeen (77 per cent) of the 22 NHS occupational health departments in the West Midlands Region replied to a postal questionnaire about pre-employment health assessment. In only 5 departments (29 per cent) was the decision whether to interview and examine a prospective employee dependent on the results of a self-administered questionnaire. All departments were asked how many prospective employees had been screened and how many rejected/restricted over a 2 week period. Departments which interviewed/examined all prospective employees tended to have higher rejection/restriction rates than departments operating a selective policy: 6 (2.6 per cent) out of 232 versus 16 (1.4 per cent) out of 1140, relative risk 1.6, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.8 to 3.4, P=0.31. In departments which did not automatically interview/examine prospective employees, the median proportion seen by nurses was 56 per cent, and by doctors was only 12 per cent. Within one NHS Region we have documented wide variation in what constitutes a pre-employment health assessment. A selective approach would release a significant amount of occupational health staff time.

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr M. R. Braddick, Registrar in Public Health Medicine, Department of Public Health Medicine, Hilton Hospital, Inverness IV2 3PH, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.