Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laite, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laite, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1993;43:23-26
© 1993 Society of Occupational Medicine


research-article

Audit of near patient cholesterol testing in occupational health clinics

F. A. Majeed*,, H. J. Turner{dagger}, J. M. Stuart{ddagger}, R. D. O. Cooper§ and P. A. Laite

*Registrar in Public Health Medicine, Gloucester Health Authority Gloucester
{dagger}Assistant Laboratory Manager, Chemical Pathology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital Gloucester
{ddagger}Consultant in Public Health Medicine, Gloucester Health Authority Gloucester
§Grade B Clinical Scientist, Chemical Pathology Department, Cheltenham General Hospital Cheltenham
¶Consultant Chemical Pathologist, Chemical Pathology Department, Cheltenham and Gloucestershire Royal Hospital Gloucester

An audit of near patient cholesterol testing was carried out in occupational health clinics. The aims were to examine the statistical agreement between Reflotron and laboratory measurements of blood cholesterol and to formulate a policy for the use of Reflotrons in cholesterol testing. Three hundred and fifty-two staff members attending occupational health clinics over a period of 10 months had blood taken for both Reflotron and laboratory measurements. The correlation between the two methods was 0.95. The Reflotron had a negative bias compared to the laboratory, with the mean difference between the two methods of measurement being –0.21 mmol/l (95 per cent confidence interval –0.18 to –0.25mmol/l). Despite the high correlation coefficient and small mean difference, the scatter of Reflotron-laboratory differences was broad, with 95 per cent of the differences lying in the range of 0.95 mmol/l below to 0.52 mmol/l above the laboratory result. For Reflotron results of 5.50 mmol/l and greater, the sensitivity and specificity of the Reflotron in detecting subjects with laboratory cholesterol levels greater than 6.5 mmol/l were 100 per cent and 70 per cent respectively. The laboratory participated in two external quality assessment schemes for cholesterol testing during the course of the audit and all the results of these fell within the acceptable limits. The audit demonstrated that the Reflotron was too imprecise to be used to give accurate measurements of blood cholesterol. However, providing a suitable Reflotron result above which patients were sent for confirmatory laboratory testing was selected, it was an acceptable screening device in the detection of hypercholesterolaemia. Other Reflotron users should consider carrying out similar audits.


Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Majeed, Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.