Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agius, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agius, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1995;45:125-130
© 1995 Society of Occupational Medicine

research-article

Audit of sickness absence and fitness-for-work referrals

R. M. Agius*,, A. Seaton{dagger} and R. J. Lee*

* Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK
{dagger} Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University Medical School Aberdeen, UK

Since referrals in relation to sickness absence and fitness to continue work constitute an important part of occupational physicians' workloads, a study was carried out to audit this activity. Randomly selected referrals (u=162) were audited by external peer review in relation to the information provided in the referral request, the consultation records and responses of the occupational physicians, and the response times linking the referral, the consultation and the response. The study showed that the referral record was adequate when specifying or quantifying long-term absences (90% and 84% of relevant cases, respectively) but questions or information regarding other relevant issues were much less frequent, eg only 12% of the referral records provided a description of the job or task. The physicians' response rate was high in relation to likely date of return to work (96%) but lower for other relevant items. In all the issues audited, the frequency of the physicians' responses was higher than the frequency with which the relevant questions were posed to them, thus suggesting ‘added value’ in the formulation of the problem by the physicians. The response times (often interpreted as a measure of health care quality) did not correlate usefully with the completeness of the responses as determined by peer review audit. Occupational physicians should aspire to achieve a validated standard of assessment and communication which can be audited.

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr R. M. Agius, Department of Public Health Sciences, The Medical School, Teviot Place. Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
R. Wahlstrom and K. Alexanderson
Chapter 11. Physicians' sick-listing practices
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 32(5): 222 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Nieuwenhuijsen, J H A M Verbeek, J C M J Siemerink, and D Tummers-Nijsen
Quality of rehabilitation among workers with adjustment disorders according to practice guidelines; a retrospective cohort study
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2003; 60(90001): i21 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.