Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, C.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, C.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1995;45:131-136
© 1995 Society of Occupational Medicine


research-article

A study of absence rates in male and female employees working in occupations of equal status

C. Sharp and S. Watt

Department of Environmental & Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK

The objective of this study was to investigate the extent to which occupational status and age influence absence rates in male and female employees. This involved collection of data for absences of one or more calendar days, including the length of absence and the location, age, occupational status and gender of the worker. This information was supplied by personnel departments on standardized forms. The study took place in three occupational groups in two organizations with equal work status for men and women, located in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. In total, we studied 2561 workers (77.8% male, 22.2% female) in employment during the three months between April and July 1992. More women than men took time off work in the study period. Female absence exceeded male absence for spells of absence in ratios between 1.3:1 and 1.5:1, and for days in ratios between 1.2:1 and 1.9:1; age standardization removed the differences in spell rates (in all but one group) and total absence (days). Both men and women took fewer but longer spells of absence with increasing age. Men were more likely to take spells lasting more than one day, but women took more multiple single-day spells. Relative job status affected absence rates, with professional staff taking less absence than support staff. In this workforce controlled for occupation, significant differences in crude absence rates were observed between males and females. Age standardization explained the difference in spell rates in most groups. This suggests that there is little true difference in absence rates and highlights the importance of age standardization in such studies.


Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Chris Sharp, RAF Aviation Medicine Training Centre, Royal Air Eorce North Luffenham, Oakham, Leicestershire, LE 15 8RL, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
M. Voss, B. Floderus, and F. Diderichsen
Changes in sickness absenteeism following the introduction of a qualifying day for sickness benefit - findings from Sweden Post
Scand J Public Health, July 1, 2001; 29(3): 166 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Nystuen, K. B. Hagen, and J. Herrin
Mental health problems as a cause of long-term sick leave in the Norwegian workforce
Scand J Public Health, July 1, 2001; 29(3): 175 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M Voss, B Floderus, and F Diderichsen
Physical, psychosocial, and organisational factors relative to sickness absence: a study based on Sweden Post
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2001; 58(3): 178 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.