Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manninen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Heliövaara, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manninen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Heliövaara, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1995;45:141-146
© 1995 Society of Occupational Medicine

research-article

Incidence and risk factors of low-back pain in middle-aged farmers

P. Manninen*,, H. Riihimäki{dagger} and M. Heliövaara{ddagger}

* Department of Community Health and General Practice, University of Kuopio Kuopio, Finland
{dagger} Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Helsinki, Finland
{ddagger} Social Insurance Institution Helsinki, Finland

A 12-year follow-up study was carried out to evaluate the risk factors for unspecified low-back pain and sciatic pain. Middle-aged farmers who did not report any low-back or neck-shoulder pain during the previous year in a postal questionnaire in 1979 were included in the follow-up study in 1992 (n = 537). In total, 366 (68%) of these farmers were interviewed by telephone. In 1992, the one-year prevalence rates of unspecified low-back pain (13.3%) and sciatic pain (9.6%) were low. Full-time farmers had a significantly higher prevalence of sciatic pain than did part-time or retired farmers. In the logistic regression modelling of sciatic pain in men, the odds ratio was 9.6 (95% CI: 2.7–65.2) for current smokers and 13.1 (95% CI: 1.7–53.0) for ex-smokers as compared to never smokers. Mental stress, body height, body mass index and production factors did not predict unspecified low-back pain or sciatic pain. Farmers who are free of back problems in middle age seem to stay well in the long run despite the heavy work. The close association between smoking and the prevalence of sciatic pain found in men is in line with the hypothesis that smoking is a causal risk factor for lumbar disc disease.

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Pirjo Manninen, Department of Community Health and General Practice, Kuopio University, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. A. Stafford, P. Peng, and D. A. Hill
Sciatica: a review of history, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and the role of epidural steroid injection in management
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 461 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.