Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elton, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elton, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1995;45:234-238
© 1995 Society of Occupational Medicine

research-article

Is a telephone helpline of value to the workplace smoker?

A. Amos*,, D. A. White{dagger} and R. A. Elton*

* Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK
{dagger}Occupational Health Service, British Telecommunications Plc UK

This paper reports the findings of the evaluation of a national smokers' helpline which was set up by British Telecom (BT) for its employees. The helpline formed part of a new comprehensive smoking policy for all BT staff. Over 1000 employees, more than 3.0% of all smokers, phoned the helpline during the first three months of its operation. Two-thirds of callers tried to quit smoking after calling the helpline, and a quarter were still successful three months later. One in six callers reduced the number of cigarettes that they smoked on working days. While the helpline and other cessation support services were evaluated positively by callers, it appears that helplines only appeal to a small minority of smokers. However, they do seem to be an effective mechanism for a nationwide company to identify those smokers who want support, and a useful means of centralizing the administration of support services. They are potentially a cost-effective option for larger employers.

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr A. Amos, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.