Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leighton, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leighton, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1995;45:263-267
© 1995 Society of Occupational Medicine

research-article

Epidemiological aspects of back pain: the incidence and prevalence of back pain in nurses compared to the general population

D. J. Leighton and T. Reilly

School of Human Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool, UK

Two studies using retrospective questionnaires were conducted to obtain epidemiological information from nursing personnel (n= 1134) and among an age-and gender-matched cross-secton of the general population (n= 315). The point and annual prevalence of back pain did not differ between the two sample groups. Nurses demonstrated a greater annual incidence of back pain (14.7%, compared to 11.5% in non-nurses). The point prevalence of back pain increased with age in both sample groups. Nurses considered patient-handling tasks instrumental in the onset of back pain symptoms. Comparison of results with those obtained from a similar study published in 1983 indicated an increase of almost 40% in the prevalence of back pain symptoms in nurses, although the linearity of the rise was not ascertained. The implementation of guidelines on the manual handling of loads has led to revised training procedures and these may have influenced the epidemiological findings.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Miss D. Leighton, School of Human Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Mountford Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK

Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Professor T. Reilly, School of Human Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Mountford Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J Smedley, J Poole, E Waclawski, A Stevens, J Harrison, P Buckle, and D Coggon
Assessing investment in manual handling risk controls: a scoring system for use in observational studies
Occup. Environ. Med., January 1, 2005; 62(1): 63 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
M. A. Jones, G. Stratton, T. Reilly, and V. B. Unnithan
A school-based survey of recurrent non-specific low-back pain prevalence and consequences in children
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2004; 19(3): 284 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
W Eriksen, D Bruusgaard, and S Knardahl
Work factors as predictors of intense or disabling low back pain; a prospective study of nurses' aides
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2004; 61(5): 398 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A. Ozguler, A. Leclerc, M.-F. Landre, F. Pietri-Taleb, and I. Niedhammer
Individual and occupational determinants of low back pain according to various definitions of low back pain
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2000; 54(3): 215 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.