Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Weide, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doef, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Weide, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doef, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1997;47:294-300
© 1997 Society of Occupational Medicine


research-article

An audit of occupational health care for employees with low-back pain

W. E. van der Weide, J. H. A. M. Verbeek, F. J. H. van Dijk and J. Doef

Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, Academic Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Guidelines for occupational rehabilitation of workers with low-back pain were developed as part of a larger study. We have formulated criteria for good practice of occupational rehabilitation on the basis of these guidelines. To assess the quality of occupational rehabilitation in the Netherlands, these criteria were subsequently used in an audit of medical records. The number of patients who received care consistent with the guidelines was compared to the number of patients eligible to receive that kind of care (performance rate). Six performance rates were calculated from the medical files of 40 workers with 48 new episodes of low-back pain. Two performance rates proved to be below 25% and two almost 50%. The highest performance rate, that for curative policy, was 90%. These results are discussed in the light of the reliability of the original data. We recommend construction of guidelines as well as reliable registration of the occupational rehabilitation process to increase the possibilities of auditing and to raise the quality of occupational health care.

Keywords      Medical audit; medical records; quality assessment; performance rate

Received        2 July 1996
Accepted        8 May 1997


Correspondence and reprint requests to: W. van der Weide, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel: (+31) 20 566 4878/5325 (secretariat); Fax: (+31) 20 697 7161


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.