Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cathcart, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cathcart, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1997;47:473-478
© 1997 Society of Occupational Medicine


research-article

Enzyme exposure, smoking and lung function in employees in the detergent industry over 20 years

M. Cathcart*,, D. Nicholson{dagger}, D. Roberts{ddagger}, M. Bazley{ddagger}, C. Juniper{ddagger}, P. Murray$$$, M. Randell{dagger} and Medical Subcommittee of the UK Soap and Detergent Industry Association

* Albright & Wilson UK Limited PO Box 3, 210-222 Hagley Road West, Oldbury, Warley, West Midlands, UK
{dagger} Procter and Gamble PO Box 1EE, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
{ddagger} Unilever Plc, Unilever House Blackfriars, London, UK
$$$ Unilever Research and Engineering PO Box 114, 3130 AC, Vlaardingen, Netherlands

This study was undertaken to examine the long term relationship between lung function, smoking and exposure to enzymes in the detergent industry. A total of 731 male workers from five locations in the United Kingdom were subject to respiratory health surveillance including lung function testing over a period of 4–20 years. Exposure groups were defined by job history. Significantly different rates of fall in FEV1 and FVC with time were fourtd by geographical location and by smoking habit, but there were no consistent trends with enzyme exposure.

Keywords      Detergent; detergent industry; enzymes; lung function tests; smoking

Received        7 October 1996
Accepted       12 June 1997


Correspondence and reprint requests to: M. Cathcart, Albright & Wilson UK Limited, PO Box 3, 210-222 Hagley Road West, Oldbury, Warley, West Midlands, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P. Cullinan
Occupational asthma
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2008; 65(3): 151 - 151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
D. Gautrin, A.J. Newman-Taylor, H. Nordman, and J-L. Malo
Controversies in epidemiology of occupational asthma
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2003; 22(3): 551 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M. Vanhanen, T. Tuomi, U. Tiikkainen, O. Tupasela, R. Voutilainen, and H. Nordman
Risk of enzyme allergy in the detergent industry
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2000; 57(2): 121 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.