Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1998;48:7-16
© 1998 Society of Occupational Medicine

research-article

A five-year study comparing early retirements on medical grounds in ambulance personnel with those in other groups of health service staff

Part I: Incidences of retirements

L. M. Rodgers

Belfast City Hospital Trust 31 Malone Place, Belfast BT12 5FD, N Ireland

The objective of this study was to compare morbidity between ambulance staff and other groups of health service workers, to facilitate planning of occupational health (OH) services. A retrospective study of employees of The Eastern Health and Social Services Board, Northern Ireland was conducted. Subjects were 181 men and 353 women assessed at OH between 1988–92 and found eligible (on the basis of permanent incapacity) to apply for early retirement on medical grounds (EROMG). Ambulance personnel showed a high rate of EROMG (55.9/1,000 per annum) both compared with previous ambulance studies (5.7–22.5/1,000), and with other groups in the present study (manual 24.8/1,000, nursing 5.9/1,000 and non-manual 2.6/1,000). Indirect standardization was used to correct for age-sex differences between groups, by deriving standardized early retirement ratios (SERR). Ambulance and manual staff showed high SERRs (636, Cl=558–714 and 164, Cl=149–179), whereas nursing and non-manual staff showed low SERRs (91, Cl=75–107 and 38, Cl=25–52), (all results except that for nursing staff being significant at {rho}<0.001). There is evidence that ambulance staff are a group with high morbidity, and thus deserving of particular attention in terms of preventative and health promotional activities. Other issues requiring consideration in relation to ambulance staff are redeployment and lowering of the retirement age.

Keywords      Ambulance; incapacity; morbidity; retirement

Received       21 November 1996
Accepted       21 July 1997

Correspondence and reprint requests to: L. M. Rodgers, Belfast City Hospital Trust, 31 Malone Place, Belfast BT12 5FD, N. Ireland. Tel: 01232-231491


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.