Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pitt, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pitt, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 1999;49:556-558
© 1999 Society of Occupational Medicine


research-article

Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods

R. Jones and N. Pitt

Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow UK

Health surveys in the workplace are an important part of epidemiology, needs assessment and health promotion. Since the workplace is changing rapidly with the use of computer networks, we examined the feasibility, validity and cost of health surveys using email and the World Wide Web (WWW). Five hundred systematically sampled university staff in a convenience sample of 10 English universities were surveyed using either email alone, email plus a WWW form or postal questionnaire. Response rates, speed of response, validity and costs were examined. The postal survey obtained the best response rate: 72% as compared with 34% for email alone and 19% for the WWW, but it was also the most expensive at 92p per reply, with 35p for email, and 41p for the WWW. Most of the electronic responses were made within five days. In 1997, the increased response rate justified the higher cost of postal questicnnaires. Email and WWW surveys are easy, quick and inexpensive to administer, and despite low response rates may be useful for pilot studies. The rapid changes in the spread and use of information technology means we have to keep reassessing the methods we use for health surveys in the workplace

Keywords      Information Technology; research methods; workplace

Received       26 April 1999
Accepted       21 June 1999


Correspondence to: R. Jones, Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, 2 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK. Tel: (+44) 141-330-5007; Fax: (+44) 141-330-5018; Email: r.b.jones{at}udcf.gla.ac.uk.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
S. Dolnicar, C. Laesser, and K. Matus
Online Versus Paper: Format Effects in Tourism Surveys
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2009; 47(3): 295 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
N. Malhotra
Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys
Public Opin Q, December 23, 2008; (2008) nfn050v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
C. Lusk, G. L. Delclos, K. Burau, D. D. Drawhorn, and L. A. Aday
Mail Versus Internet Surveys: Determinants of Method of Response Preferences Among Health Professionals
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2007; 30(2): 186 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Schonlau, B. J. Asch, and C. Du
Web Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Strategy for Populations that cannot be Contacted by E-Mail
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2003; 21(2): 218 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. R. McMahon, M. Iwamoto, M. S. Massoudi, H. R. Yusuf, J. M. Stevenson, F. David, S. Y. Chu, and L. K. Pickering
Comparison of E-mail, Fax, and Postal Surveys of Pediatricians
Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): e299 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
R. D. Fricker and M. Schonlau
Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature
Field Methods, November 1, 2002; 14(4): 347 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D C Fiore and J D Houston
Injuries in whitewater kayaking
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2001; 35(4): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga
A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 218 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J.-F. Etter and T. V Perneger
A comparison of cigarette smokers recruited through the Internet or by mail
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. Cook, F. Heath, and R. L. Thompson
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2000; 60(6): 821 - 836.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.