Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Failde, I.
Right arrow Articles by Elorza, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Failde, I.
Right arrow Articles by Elorza, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 2000;50:591-596
© 2000 Society of Occupational Medicine

Psychological and Occupational Predictive Factors for Back Pain among Employees of a University Hospital in Southern Spain

I. Failde*,, J. L. Gonzalez{dagger}, J. P. Novalbos*, F. Casais{ddagger}, J. Marin{ddagger} and J. Elorza§

* Preventive Medicine and Public Health Area
{dagger} Mathematical Department Cadiz, Spain
{ddagger} Physiotherapy Area, ‘Puerta del Mar’ University Hospital Cadiz, Spain
§ Psychiatiy Department, University of Cadiz

Objectives: To identify the individual and occupational factors that are predictors for low back pain among the employees of a university hospital in southern Spain.

Methods: A transverse study was conducted in which the population used was the hospital employees who volunteered to participate. The information was obtained by using a questionnaire, which included demographic and anthropometric variables, habits, characteristics of the work done, and of any pain experienced. The mental health condition of subjects was measured using the GHQ-28, using a score of ≥6 as the cut-off point. To study the variables associated with pain, crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated (± 95% Cl) and adjusted according to a logistic regression model.

Results: One thousand one hundred and four subjects participated in the study but only 890 of these completed the questionnaire in full (rate of response, 35.7% of total employees). The population studied was notable for the high proportion of women, for subjects >41 years of age, and subjects who undertook little or no physical exercise. In addition, according to the GHQ-28 test, 29.9% of the total were ‘probable psychiatric cases’. The crude ORs were high in all the occupational categories in comparison with the doctors, with the exception of the maintenance, cleaning, and catering group. They were also higher among women, among subjects with poor mental health, and among women with one or more children. The adjusted ORs showed that having a GHQ-28 score of ≥6, and belonging to the auxiliary technician category, were independent risk factors for suffering low back pain. Being older than 41 years and in temporary employment were protective variables.

Conclusions: The presence of probable mental illness is the variable most strongly associated with the presence of low back pain in the population studied. Its diagnostic confirmation and appropriate treatment could contribute to reducing the prevalence of vertebral pains in this occupational group.

Keywords      Health workers; low back pain; risk factors

Received        4 January 2000
Accepted       20 July 2000


Correspondence to: Dr I. Failde, Escuela Universitaria de Ciencias de Ia Salud, Universidad de Cádiz, C/ Duque de Nájera 18, 11002 Cádiz, Spain. Tel: +34 956 212988; fax: +34 956 224218; e-mail: inmaculada.failde{at}uca.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Virtanen, M. Kivimaki, M. Joensuu, P. Virtanen, M. Elovainio, and J. Vahtera
Temporary employment and health: a review
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 610 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.