Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 52:401-406 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 Society of Occupational Medicine

The estimated workforce served by occupational physicians in the UK

J. C. McDonald

Correspondence to: J. Corbett McDonald, Imperial College School of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK. e-mail: c.mcdonald{at}ic.ac.uk

Abstract

During the past decade, an occupational disease surveillance scheme has been created in the UK, based on systematic reporting of newly diagnosed cases by six groups of clinical consultants and by specialist occupational physicians. Labour Force Survey statistics have proved a reasonably satisfactory denominator for the former, but not for the occupational physicians, who provide services for only a selected subsection of the employed population. To remedy this deficiency, ~700 occupational physicians who were recorded as having been a reporter at some time were invited to provide their best estimate of the number of employees for whom they were responsible. After various exclusions—mainly physicians who were not, or were no longer, responsible for any defined workforce, and others who had not reported for at least 3 years—the number of active participants for whom data, by industry, occupation and sex, were obtained or estimated was 503. The resulting total number of employees served was estimated at 3.2 million, comprising 12% of the general working population. The proportion with access to an occupational physician varied enormously, from 43% in the health and social services to 1% in agriculture, forestry and fishing, and 6% in the rest of industry. Numbers estimated for each industrial sector were fairly reliable, but by occupation less so, especially in the health and social services.

Keywords      Estimated denominator; occupational physicians; surveillance; workforce served


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J C McDonald, Y Chen, C Zekveld, and N M Cherry
Incidence by occupation and industry of acute work related respiratory diseases in the UK, 1992-2001
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2005; 62(12): 836 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. Beach and D. Watt
General practitioners and occupational health professionals
BMJ, August 9, 2003; 327(7410): 302 - 303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.