Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mastrangelo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Saia, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mastrangelo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Saia, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine 53:165-172 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 Society of Occupational Medicine

Ascertaining the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in relation to occupation using a case–control design

G. Mastrangelo, M. Tartari, U. Fedeli, E. Fadda and B. Saia

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health—Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, I-35128 Padova, Italy.

Correspondence to: Dr G. Mastrangelo, Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health—Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, I-35128 Padova, Italy. e-mail: giuseppe.mastrangelo{at}unipd.it

Abstract

Background Recent community surveys have reported a risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in occupations involving exposure to organic dust and gas/vapour.

Aims Our aim was to confirm these results using a case–control design on 131 COPD cases (FEV1 < 80% of predicted value, minimally reversible with bronchodilators) and 298 controls, selected from registers for patients admitted to our Institute of Occupational Medicine.

Methods Surrogates of past exposure were occupation, exposure assigned by a job–exposure matrix, and years spent in a given occupation. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for COPD were calculated using logistic regression models with office workers as the reference.

Results Age–smoking-adjusted ORs (and CIs) were: 15.1 (3.2–71.6) in farmers; 7.2 (1.3–41.1) in cotton workers; 6.4 (1.6–25.5) in welders; 4.7 (1.3–16.4) in painters; 12.1 (1.3–108) in foundry workers; 6.50 (1.14–37.0) in refractory brick workers; and 3.1 (1.0–9.5) in construction workers. In farmers, cotton workers, welders and painters, the adjusted ORs significantly increased (by 6–9%) for each extra year of work, while in other occupations any such increase was of borderline significance. Adjusted ORs were 3.80 (1.21–12.0), 5.83 (1.82–18.6) and 8.86 (2.29–34.3) in workers exposed to high levels of mineral dust, gas/vapour/fume and biological dust, respectively. Consistent risk estimates were obtained for farmers, textile workers, painters and welders.

Conclusions Our findings confirm previous epidemiological evidence and are supported by recent observations that cigarette smoke, cotton and organic farm dust contain the same powerful pro-inflammatory agents, and that organic dust and irritant gas induce bronchitis by triggering the same effector molecules as cigarette smoke.

Keywords      Case–control study; chronic bronchitis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; epidemiology; occupational exposure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.