Skip Navigation

Occupational Medicine 2005 55(7):552-557; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi152
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fultz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sternfeld, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fultz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sternfeld, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Prevalence, management and impact of urinary incontinence in the workplace

Nancy Fultz1, Tammy Girts2, Kraig Kinchen3, Ingrid Nygaard4, Gerhardt Pohl3 and Barbara Sternfeld5

1 Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, G135C Lane Hall, 204 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1290, USA
2 Health Economics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road/PO Box 368, Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA
3 Outcomes Research Department, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 2 BT GH, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
5 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

Background The few prior studies of urinary symptoms in the workplace have been small investigations of women in specific occupations (e.g. nursing) or industries (e.g. pottery manufacture). In this study, the aims were to describe the prevalence, management and impact of urinary incontinence for a large cross-section of employed women in the USA.

Methods Five-page questionnaires were mailed to 5130 American households selected from the National Family Opinion survey panel during the spring of 2004. Usable questionnaires were returned by 3364 women in the target age range of 18–60 years.

Results About 37% of the 2326 employed respondents reported urine loss during the last 30 days. The most common strategies for managing incontinence at work included frequent bathroom breaks and wearing pads. The use of urine control methods increased with the severity of urine loss. The effect of incontinence on workplace activities also increased with the severity of urine loss: 88% of employed women with the most severe symptoms reported at least some negative impact on concentration, performance of physical activities, self-confidence or the ability to complete tasks without interruption.

Conclusion Urinary incontinence is prevalent among employed women. Those who experience severe symptoms report that it has a negative effect on aspects of work. Programs on the prevalence and impact of urinary incontinence would help educate both employers and employees, and may lead to the development of better management techniques in the workplace.

Keywords      Epidemiology; survey research; urinary incontinence; women's health


Correspondence to: Nancy Fultz, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, G135C Lane Hall, 204 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1290, USA. Tel: +1 734 615 6432; fax: +1 734 764 9533; e-mail: nfultz{at}umich.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.