Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on November 11, 2005
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(1):46-50; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi194
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/1/46    most recent
kqi194v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ratzon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ratzon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Time to return to work and surgeons' recommendations after carpal tunnel release

Navah Ratzon1, Tamara Schejter-Margalit2 and Paul Froom3

1 Department of Occupational Therapy, Tel Aviv University, PO Box 39040, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
2 Formerly at: Department of Occupational Medicine, Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
3 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Background Time to return to work after carpal tunnel release is extremely variable suggesting that only a small proportion of total sick-leave is for medical reasons.

Aims To determine factors predicting a delayed return to work.

Methods Fifty consecutive employed patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery were tested pre-operatively, and then at 1 month post-operatively using both questionnaires and objective testing. Further follow-up by telephone was carried out every 2 weeks up until 90 days.

Results Forty-nine of the 50 workers had returned to work by 3 months. Time to return to work was extremely variable ranging from 1 to 88 days in those who returned to work. Post-operative recommendations by the surgeon also varied widely from 1 to 36 days. The surgeons' recommendations were the strongest predictors of delayed return to work [odds ratio 30.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2–288], with physical work (odds ratio 27.7; 95% CI, 1.5–507) and lack of self-rated health (odds ratio 5.0; 95% CI, 1.11–100) adding significantly to the logistic regression model, which was highly predictive (area under the receiver–operator curve of 88%). Patient symptoms and objective findings of disability did not add significantly to a logistic regression model either predicting return to work or the surgeon's recommendations.

Conclusions Our study suggests that workers will return to work in less than 3 weeks if recommended by the surgeon. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to determine if a higher proportion of workers returning in less than 3 weeks can be obtained by standardizing surgeons' recommendations.

Keywords      Absenteeism; carpal tunnel release; occupational; surgeons' recommendations


Correspondence to: Navah Ratzon, Department of Occupational Therapy, Tel Aviv University, PO Box 39040, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. Tel: +972-3-6405443; fax: +972-3-6409933; e-mail: navah{at}post.tau.ac.il


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
M. C. WYATT and G. A. VEALE
Early Return to Work Following Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression in Lamb Freezing Workers
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., August 1, 2008; 33(4): 440 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.