Skip Navigation

Occupational Medicine 2006 56(1):51-54; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi190
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zibrowski, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, J. McD.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zibrowski, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, J. McD.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

SHORT REPORT

Olfactory sensitivity in medical laboratory workers occupationally exposed to organic solvent mixtures

Elaine M. Zibrowski1,2 and James McD. Robertson1

1 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Kresge Building, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1
2 Group for the Advocacy and Advancement of Medical and Dental Education at the University of Western Ontario (GAMES), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8

Background Published epidemiological information relating the effects of occupational exposure to organic solvents (OS) to olfaction is limited.

Aims The objectives of this pilot study were to measure the chemosensory abilities of medical laboratory employees occupationally exposed to OS mixtures, to compare these with control workers employed within the same occupational setting and to correlate chemosensory performance with OS exposure history and with employees' hedonic (pleasantness) perceptions about workplace OS odors.

Methods Twenty-four medical laboratory employees (OS-exposed technicians plus control workers minimally exposed to OS) completed a health-related questionnaire, a test of pyridine odor detection threshold, along with a gustatory detection threshold test involving aqueous quinine solutions. Estimates of cumulative hours of OS exposure (CSI) were calculated from self-reports.

Results OS-exposed laboratory technicians detected weaker concentrations of pyridine odor. Positive correlations were detected between CSI estimates to both pyridine detection and the degree that participants reported that OS odors were present in the workplace. However, no association was detected between pyridine detection and how unpleasant workplace OS odors were perceived. The OS-exposed participants were able to detect weaker concentrations of quinine. Compared to controls, OS-exposed workers complained more of experiencing several symptoms while working, including headaches, nasal irritation and mild cognitive impairment.

Conclusions The results of this cross-sectional pilot study indicated that, compared to controls, medical laboratory technicians exposed to low-level OS mixtures displayed evidence of elevated olfactory sensitivity (hyperosmia) to pyridine odor. The relation of this study's results to chemical intolerance warrants further investigation.

Keywords      Chemosensory; occupational exposure; olfaction; pyridine; solvents


Correspondence to: Elaine M. Zibrowski, c/o GAMES, Suite 227, 100 Collip Circle, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8; e-mail: elaine.zibrowski{at}schulich.uwo.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.