Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2005
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(2):100-101; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqj002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/2/100    most recent
kqj002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinoulty, M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kinoulty, M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Occupational health provision and health surveillance in the semiconductor industry

Mary Kinoulty1 and Nerys Williams2

1 Health & Safety Executive, 1 Hagley Road, Birmingham B16 8HS, UK
2 Employment Medical Advisory Service, Health & Safety Executive, 1 Hagley Road, Birmingham B16 8HS, UK

Aims To identify the nature of occupational health provision in UK semiconductor-manufacturing plants. To identify the level of industry compliance with legal health surveillance requirements.

Method A national inspection programme was carried out by Health & Safety Executive inspectors using a developed protocol.

Results A wide range of occupational health provision was identified from none to use of an accredited specialist. The majority of work was of a reactive nature even where there was specialist occupational health input. Seven companies were identified as not meeting legal compliance and one as having unacceptable compliance for health surveillance.

Conclusions The spectrum of occupational health provision was very wide. Where health surveillance was provided, it was poorly targeted with limited interpretation and feedback to management.

Keywords      Health surveillance; occupational health provision; semiconductor industry

Correspondence to: Mary Kinoulty, Grosvenor Health Ltd, Grosvenor House, Prospect Hill, Redditch B97 4DL, UK. e-mail: Mary.Kinoulty{at}grosvenorhealth.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.