Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on December 21, 2005
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(2):102-109; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqj005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/2/102    most recent
kqj005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leroux, I.
Right arrow Articles by Montreuil, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leroux, I.
Right arrow Articles by Montreuil, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Job strain and neck–shoulder symptoms: a prevalence study of women and men white-collar workers

Isabelle Leroux1, Chantal Brisson1,2 and Sylvie Montreuil3

1 Unité de recherche en santé des populations, Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada
2 Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, G1K 7P4, Canada
3 Département des relations industrielles, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, G1K 7P4, Canada

Background Neck–shoulder symptoms are frequent among workers. Psychosocial factors at work have been associated with neck–shoulder symptoms, but few studies have examined job strain, the combined effect of high psychological demands (PD) and low decision latitude (DL).

Aims To examine the association between psychosocial factors at work and the prevalence of self-reported neck–shoulder symptoms among white-collar workers.

Methods In a cross-sectional study of 1543 white-collar workers, PD and DL at work were measured with Karasek's questionnaire. Prevalent cases were workers for whom neck–shoulder symptoms were present for ≥3 days during the previous 7 days and for whom pain intensity was greater than half the visual analogue scale. Gender and social support at work were evaluated as potential effect modifiers.

Results Workers exposed to high job strain had a higher prevalence of neck–shoulder symptoms [adjusted prevalence ratio (PR): 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–2.37]. No modifying effect of gender was observed in this association. The effect of job strain was stronger in workers with low social support (adjusted PR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.92–3.68). These associations tended to be stronger and/or more precise when using alternative exposures and case definition. Namely, a stronger job strain effect was observed when a tertile cut-off was used to classify exposure (adjusted PR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.15–5.32).

Conclusion These results suggest that primary prevention of neck–shoulder symptoms among white-collar workers should consider the exposure to job strain, especially when workers are exposed to low social support at work.

Keywords      Neck pain; psychosocial factors; stress; work; workload


Correspondence to: Isabelle Leroux, Unité de recherche en santé des populations, Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada. e-mail: ileroux{at}uresp.ulaval.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.