Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on December 15, 2005
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(2):94-99; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi197
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/2/94    most recent
kqi197v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feuerstein, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feuerstein, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine 2005

Development of a short form of the Workstyle measure

Michael Feuerstein1,2 and Rena A. Nicholas1

1 Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
2 Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA

Background ‘Workstyle’, or how a worker behaviourally, cognitively and physiologically responds to increased or stressful work demands, has been proposed to help explain the link between ergonomic and psychosocial factors in work-related upper limb disorder symptoms and disorders (WRULD).

Aim To describe the psychometric properties of a shortened version of the original Workstyle measure.

Methods Factor analyses of the Workstyle measure items were conducted to reduce the number of total items. Each of the subscales was then further reduced by randomly selecting half of the items within each subscale. Additionally, two subscales from the original survey (Pain/Tension and Numbness/Tingling) were eliminated because they were not used to calculate the original workstyle total score in order to reduce the influence of current symptoms on an individual's total score.

Results The Workstyle Short Form was reduced to 32 items. Cronbach's {alpha} was 0.89 and the test–retest reliability was r = 0.88, P < 0.01, for the total score. The short form score was significantly correlated with the full workstyle total score, r = 0.98, P < 0.01. Higher total workstyle scores were significantly associated with pain, functional limitations and adverse mental and physical health.

Conclusion The Workstyle Short Form demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. These findings indicate its potential utility in research on WRULD.

Keywords      Ergonomics; job stress; occupational; pain; risk factors; upper limb symptoms; workstyle; WRULD


Correspondence to: Michael Feuerstein, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Tel: +3012959677; fax: +3012953034; e-mail: mfeuerstein{at}usuhs.mil


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. Fabrizio
Ergonomic Intervention in the Treatment of a Patient With Upper Extremity and Neck Pain
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 351 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.