Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on March 6, 2006
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(4):232-236; doi:10.1093/occmed/kql002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/4/232    most recent
kql002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, F.
Right arrow Articles by Waclawski, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, F.
Right arrow Articles by Waclawski, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Upper limb disorders among coopers in the Scotch whisky industry

Fiona Macdonald1 and Eugene Waclawski2

1 Diageo–Occupational Health, Inchinnan Road, Renfrew PA4 9EB, UK
2 Top Floor, NHS Argyll and Clyde Occupational Health Service, Hollybush House, Dykebar Hospital, Grahamstone Road, Paisley, PA2 7DE, UK

Background Coopering is a physically demanding trade which has existed for >500 years. Anecdotal clinical evidence suggested increased prevalence of upper limb disorders in the population of coopers in one organization.

Aims To investigate the prevalence of upper limb disorders in coopers and non-coopers. To identify differences in prevalence, and any relationship between the findings and the work practices.

Method Cross-sectional study of 108 coopers and 110 non-coopers. The Standardized Nordic questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms was administered to all participants, who also underwent a clinical assessment for upper limb disorders.

Results Coopers were more likely to report elbow pain in the past 12 months (OR 3.4; 95% CI: 1.8–6.2) and pain in the last 7 days (OR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.0–8.9) and this was likely to lead to prevention of activity in the past 12 months associated with the elbow (P < 0.05). Clinical evaluation highlighted a higher prevalence of upper limb disorders in coopers (OR 9.8; 95% CI: 3.9–24.3) with epicondylitis predominating (OR 8.4; 95% CI: 2.8–25.0). There was also a higher prevalence of problems in the wrist and hand among coopers (OR 8.15; 95% CI: 1.04–64; P = 0.03). Logistic regression analysis confirmed the risk of upper limb disorder in coopers (P < 0.03) accounting for age (P < 0.05) and years of service (P > 0.25).

Conclusions Coopers appear to be at an increased risk of upper limb disorders. Work practices have been reviewed and a number of changes have been implemented to reduce this risk. Further study of this group is merited in future to determine the effect of changes in work practice on the risk of upper limb disorders.

Keywords      Cooper; epicondylitis; occupational; upper limb disorder


Correspondence to: Fiona Macdonald, Diageo–Occupational Health, Inchinnan Road, Renfrew PA4 9EB, UK. Tel: 0141 885 6304; fax: 0141 885 6346; e-mail: dr.f.macdonald{at}diageo.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, July 22, 2006; 333(7560): 208 - 208.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.