Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2006
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(4):272-274; doi:10.1093/occmed/kql001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/4/272    most recent
kql001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preece, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Preece, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

SHORT REPORT

Clinical governance in UK commercial occupational health providers

Richard Preece

Atos Origin, Norcliffe House, Station Road, Wilmslow, SK9 1BB, UK

Background Clinical governance has been introduced into health care in the United Kingdom as a means to improve quality. At present there is no legal duty for commercial occupational providers to implement this model.

Aim This preliminary study examined how commercial occupational health providers had implemented clinical governance.

Methods The senior clinical manager of commercial occupational health providers completed a questionnaire.

Results Fourteen of 17 organizations asked to participate completed the survey. Most of these had implemented some form of clinical governance. Patient and public involvement was attributed the least importance of potential components of clinical governance. Organizations were more likely to have systems to address poor clinical performance than encourage excellent performance.

Conclusions Commercial occupational health providers have implemented clinical governance. Its focus appears to be avoidance of failures rather than clinical excellence and patients. However, further work is needed to explore this more fully.

Keywords      Management policy; occupational health services; quality management

Correspondence to: Richard Preece, Atos Origin, Norcliffe House, Station Road, Wilmslow, SK9 1BB, UK. e-mail: richard.preece{at}atosorigin.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.