Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on October 17, 2006
Occupational Medicine 2007 57(1):43-49; doi:10.1093/occmed/kql107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/1/43    most recent
kql107v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ihlebaek, C.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ihlebaek, C.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, H. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Health complaints and sickness absence in Norway, 1996–2003

Camilla Ihlebaek1, Soren Brage2 and Hege R. Eriksen3

1 Section of Occupational Health and Social Insurance Medicine, Norwegian Back Pain Network, Research Unit, Unifob helse, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2 Section of Occupational Health and Social Insurance Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3 Department of Education and Health Promotion, Norwegian Back Pain Network, Research Unit, Unifob helse, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Background From 1996 to 2003, the total number of sickness absence days increased by 65% in Norway.

Aim To investigate if this could be explained by a corresponding increase in the prevalence of self-reported health complaints in the same period.

Methods Representative samples of the Norwegian working population in 1996 (n = 838) and 2003 (n = 637) answered the subjective health complaints (SHC) questionnaire. The single items of the SHC questionnaire were matched with the corresponding sickness absence statistics from the National Insurance Administration in 1996 and 2003.

Results The main finding was a poor concordance between the change in prevalence of health complaints and the change in the prevalence of sickness absence for diagnoses corresponding to these complaints. The prevalence of health complaints in Norway was high and relatively stable from 1996 to 2003. The only complaints that increased in prevalence during the period were allergy and severe asthma. Sickness absence for health complaints, however, showed a general increase. The diagnoses with the largest percentage increase in sickness absence were sleep problems, tiredness, anxiety and palpitation, although the absolute number of individuals with sickness absence for these complaints was small.

Conclusions The increased sickness absence in Norway from 1996 to 2003 cannot be explained by an increase in health complaints in the general population in the same period. The increase in sickness absence is most likely to be explained by multifactorial causes, such as changes in working life and health expectations.

Keywords      Health complaints; Norway; sickness absence


Correspondence to: Camilla Ihlebaek, HALOS Unifob, University of Bergen, Christiesgt 13, 5015 Bergen, Norway. e-mail: camilla.ihlebaek{at}psych.uib.no


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. Macik-Frey, J. C. Quick, and D. L. Nelson
Advances in Occupational Health: From a Stressful Beginning to a Positive Future {dagger}
Journal of Management, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 809 - 840.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.