Skip Navigation

Occupational Medicine 2007 57(2):145-148; doi:10.1093/occmed/kql143
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mutalik, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mutalik, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

C. S. Mutalik, Ministry of Defence (Army). © Crown Copyright 2007. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

Short Reports

Training interventions for general practitioners providing an occupational health service in the British Army

Chandrakant S. Mutalik

MOD (Army)—HQ APHCS Eastern Region, Ypres Road, Colchester, Essex CO2 7NL, UK

Background General practitioners (GPs) working in the British Army, whether civilian or military, are responsible for providing a first line occupational health (OH) service in addition to their primary health care role. Despite the medical classification system being well established, previous publications have shown considerable inconsistency in the knowledge among GPs.

Aim The aim of this audit cycle was to test effectiveness of training interventions designed for GPs, providing the first line OH service.

Method The audit cycle was divided into three stages. The Stages I and III were audits examining the standard of OH records initiated by GPs during a 4-month period (pre- and post-training). The Stage II was a training intervention. Statistical significance was assessed with the chi-square test.

Results The stage one audit showed a statistically significant standard difference between the medical boards initiated by civilian and military GPs. This gap was bridged and the overall standard of the OH records improved significantly after the training.

Conclusions Appropriate training can enhance a first line OH service provided by GPs. The training must be reinforced at regular intervals. Both OH specialists and GPs can complement each other so as to identify, intervene and prevent work-related ill-health.

Keywords      Army occupational health; audit; GP training; PULHHEEMS system


Correspondence to: Chandrakant S. Mutalik, MOD (Army)—HQ APHCS Eastern Region, Ypres Road, Colchester, Essex CO2 7NL, UK. Tel: +44 7786 511652; fax: +44 1206 783616; e-mail: mutalik{at}btinternet.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.