Skip Navigation

Occupational Medicine 2007 57(7):525-531; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verow, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, M.
Right arrow Articles by Verow, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A retrospective study of return to work following surgery

Mary Clayton1 and Peter Verow2

1 Centrica, Gould Street, Manchester M4 4RN, UK
2 Sandwell Healthcare NHS Trust, 30 Hallam Close, Hallam Street, West Bromwich, UK

Background Sickness absence following surgery accounts for significant periods of sickness absence from employment. The duration of absence following two surgical procedures: benign abdominal hysterectomy (BAH) and Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) was explored.

Aim To identify what advice patients who had undergone BAH or BHR surgery were given regarding their likely sickness absence duration and to compare this with their reported absence duration.

Method In all, 453 patients who had undergone BAH or BHR surgery during 2004 were contacted by postal questionnaire and the results were statistically analysed.

Results The advice given to patients to refrain from work varied from 4 weeks to >15 weeks for BAH surgery which was inconsistent with evidence-based guidance provided by the Department of Work and Pensions. The advice for BHR varied from <4 weeks to >15 weeks. Advice given by health care professionals appeared to have the greatest influence on return to work times with patients tending to adhere to any advice that is given irrespective of its duration. Twenty-two (29%) BAH patients and thirty-six (43%) BHR patients reported that their employers provided temporary work modifications when they returned to work; however, this support appeared to have no effect on their sickness absence duration.

Conclusion Health care professional advice regarding expected sickness absence duration influenced absence duration. The awareness and use of more consistent evidence-based guidance may be beneficial for all involved in this process.

Keywords      Hip surgery; hysterectomy; return to work; sickness absence duration


Correspondence to: P. Verow, Sandwell Occupational Health Service, 30 Hallam Close, Hallam Street, West Bromwich B71 4HU, UK. e-mail: peter.verow{at}swbh.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.