Skip Navigation

Occupational Medicine 2007 57(7):532-534; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittczak, T.
Right arrow Articles by Palczynski, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wittczak, T.
Right arrow Articles by Palczynski, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Short Report

Challenge testing in the diagnosis of occupational allergic conjunctivitis

Tomasz Wittczak1,2, Anna Krakowiak1,2, Jolanta Walusiak1,2, Alicja Pas-Wyroslak3, Monika Kowalczyk1,2 and Cezary Palczynski1,2,4

1 Department of Occupational Medicine, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
2 Centre of Occupational and Environmental Allergy, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
3 Outpatient Clinic of Occupational Diseases, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
4 Department of Environmental Diseases, Medical University, Lodz, Poland

Background Providing evidence for the allergic aetiology of ocular symptoms developing as a result of occupational exposure is important for compensation procedures in many countries.

Aim To perform cellular analysis of tear fluid before and after a specific challenge test with high-molecular weight allergens in symptomatic subjects.

Methods The subjects were 23 bakers with a history of conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis associated with occupational exposure to wheat flour and positive skin prick test with this allergen. A specific inhalation challenge test with wheat flour and a placebo test were performed. The symptom score (SS) and cellular changes in tear fluid and nasal washings were assessed.

Results Specific provocation test induced significant eosinophil influx in tear fluid in only six patients. No changes in the proportion of other cells could be observed. Cytological changes in tear fluid did not correlate with either ocular SS (Pearson r = 0.18, P = 0.40) or changes in the nasal lavage fluid or SS (Pearson r = 0.13, P = 0.56). However, an analysis of SS results obtained at 30 min and at 24 h after the challenge revealed that cellular changes in tear fluid correlated significantly both with the early and late changes in SS (Pearson r = 0.52, P < 0.05 and Pearson r = 0.81, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions Analysis of cellular changes in tear fluid during specific inhalation challenge test seems to be a valuable diagnostic tool in occupational ocular allergy. However, the discrepancy between the findings of cellular analysis and SS revealed by the present study requires further research.

Keywords      Allergen challenge; eosinophils; occupational allergic conjunctivitis; tears


Correspondence to: Tomasz Wittczak, Department of Occupational Medicine, Centre of Occupational and Environmental Allergy, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8 Teresy Street, Lodz 91-348, Poland. Tel: +48 (42) 6314775; fax: +48 (42) 6314764; e-mail: tomekwit{at}imp.lodz.pl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.