Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on August 4, 2007
Occupational Medicine 2007 57(8):569-574; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/8/569    most recent
kqm080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Soutar, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Soutar, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Observed and predicted silicosis risks in heavy clay workers

Brian G. Miller and Colin A. Soutar

Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK

Background There is increasing pressure to tighten the regulation of workers' exposures to airborne silica, which can lead to severe and in some cases rapid development of disease. However, estimated risks from respirable silica vary greatly across industries.

Aim To clarify differences in risks between workers in the heavy clay and coal industries with documented exposures to respirable silica, in order to assist decisions on whether further investigation of possible differences might be justified.

Methods We applied a published equation for radiological risks from exposure to respirable silica, from a study of Scottish coalworkers (with unusually high exposures) to exposure estimates from an epidemiological study of heavy clay workers, by the same research team and using similar methods.

Results The equation based on coalworkers' risks predicted in the heavy clay workers 31 cases of abnormalities at grade 2/1+ on the International Labour Organization scale, greatly in excess of the eight cases observed. Statistical variation is an implausible explanation (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions While there were some methodological differences between the studies, the disparity in risks provides some support for the case for further investigation of possible differences.

Keywords      Coal; heavy clay; risk; silica; silicosis


Correspondence to: Brian G. Miller, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK. Tel: +44 131 449 8044; fax: +44 870 850 5132; e-mail: brian.miller{at}iom-world.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.