Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on November 13, 2007
Occupational Medicine 2007 57(8):607-609; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/8/607    most recent
kqm127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Short Reports

Benchmarking self-reported practice regarding Scottish Executive guidance on hepatitis C-infected health care workers

Markus Steiner1, Elizabeth Murphy1,2, Kirsty M. Roy3 and Finlay Dick1,2

1 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
2 NHS Grampian Occupational Health Service, Foresterhill Lea, Foresterhill Site, Aberdeen, UK
3 Health Protection Scotland, Clifton House, Clifton Place, Glasgow, UK

Background The 2002 Scottish Executive guidance ‘hepatitis C-infected health care workers’ advised NHS Scotland occupational health departments regarding screening health care workers (HCW) who perform or who may perform exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In 2004, 2 years following the launch of the guidance, there was anecdotal evidence of challenges to implementation and clinical and ethical concerns regarding the screening process.

Aim To benchmark the implementation of the Executive guidance on hepatitis C-infected HCW in NHS Scotland.

Methods Lead occupational health practitioners in 15 Scottish NHS Boards completed a questionnaire and provided relevant local policies.

Results All 15 NHS Boards responded: 87% (n = 13) had implemented the guidance with partial implementation in the remaining boards. While 87% required identified and validated samples (IVS), no consistent method was reported for how results from an IVS were recorded. There was also no consensus as to the duration a result was considered valid or consistency in charging for tests required by other employers. Across Scotland, some employee groups were being screened over and above those recommended within the guidance. Overall, there was agreement on the value of a standardized NHS hepatitis C status certificate and the importance of explicit screening criteria and identifying EPP workers.

Conclusion The survey confirms the challenges in implementing the guidance on managing HCV-infected HCW within NHS Scotland. These include lack of clarity regarding who, when and how frequently a HCW should be screened and how the results of such tests should be recorded.

Keywords      Exposure prone procedures (EPP); healthcare workers; hepatitis C; identified validated samples (IVS); screening; surveillance


Correspondence to: Markus Steiner, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Tel: +44 1224 558188; fax: +44 1224 551826; e-mail: m.steiner{at}abdn.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.