Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on June 20, 2008
Occupational Medicine 2008 58(6):413-418; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn070
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/6/413    most recent
kqn070v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duijts, S. F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Swaen, G. M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duijts, S. F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Swaen, G. M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Psychometrics and validation of a screening instrument for sickness absence

Saskia F. A. Duijts1,2, IJmert Kant1, Piet A. van den Brandt1 and Gerard M. H. Swaen1,3

1 Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2 Present address: Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Present address: Dow Chemical Terneuzen, Terneuzen, The Netherlands

Background Absence from work due to psychosocial health complaints has considerable negative effects for employees, employers and society. A better and more effective strategy would be early identification of employees at risk for psychosocial sickness absence and early intervention to prevent sickness absence as far as possible.

Aims To assess psychometric characteristics and the external validation of a recently developed screening instrument, called ‘Werkwijzer’, for the identification of employees at risk for sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints.

Methods Exploratory factor analysis was applied on items of the instrument. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to determine internal consistency of the subscales. Sum scores on the screening instrument were correlated to absenteeism data to determine their potential for predicting sickness absence. Predictive value was investigated, using objective sickness absence data as criterion measure. Sensitivity and specificity rates were calculated for external validation.

Results For both men and women, three interpretable factors were found. Sum scores on the instrument showed low correlations with sickness absence. The association between ‘being at risk’ (yes/no) and sickness absence (yes/no) was odds ratio (OR) 3.1 (95% CI 1.5–6.5) for men and OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.4–2.7) for women. Sensitivity scores were rather low, whereas specificity scores were remarkably high.

Conclusions The results of this study provide the screening instrument a theoretic and scientific basis. Predictive value is promising, when absence is treated as a dichotomous measure. Sensitivity and specificity were unvarying during the development and validation phases of the instrument.

Keywords      Instrument; prediction; psychometric; sickness absence


Correspondence to: Saskia F. A. Duijts, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, NKI-AvL, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 20 5122485; fax: +31 20 5122322; e-mail: s.duijts{at}nki.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.