Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on June 20, 2008
Occupational Medicine 2008 58(6):431-435; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn075
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/6/431    most recent
kqn075v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Youakim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Youakim, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The validity of Raynaud's phenomenon symptoms in HAVS cases

Sami Youakim

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Background Raynaud's phenomenon, a common manifestation of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS), is typically diagnosed by a subjective history provided by employees.

Aim This study evaluates the validity of the subjective history of Raynaud's phenomenon provided by individuals applying for compensation for HAVS.

Methods Thirty-six workers with a history of occupational hand–arm vibration exposure who were labelled as having Raynaud's phenomenon were asked to photographically document their finger symptoms before undergoing a detailed clinical assessment. Each individual was provided with a disposable camera and instructions. Returned photographs were reviewed for signs of Raynaud's phenomenon. The reliability of photograph interpretation was tested with three physicians and a non-physician.

Results Inter and intra-rater reliability was very good, Kappa coefficient >0.80. Six individuals (17%) did not return cameras. Thirty individuals provided photographs and underwent a clinical evaluation. The photographs of 13 individuals (43%) did not show Raynaud's phenomenon and for four of these the diagnosis was not supported by careful symptom history. Seventeen individuals (57%) had photographic evidence of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Conclusions A presenting history of Raynaud's phenomenon in workers seeking compensation for HAVS may not be accurate since approximately half the cases are unable to provide objective photographic evidence of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Keywords      Blanching; hand–arm vibration syndrome; photography; Raynaud's phenomenon; vibration white finger


Correspondence to: Sami Youakim, PO Box 53507, Broadmead RPO, Victoria, BC V8X 5K2, Canada. Tel: +1 250 858 1559; fax: +1 250 658 9451; e-mail: syouakim{at}telusplanet.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.