Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on August 25, 2008
Occupational Medicine 2008 58(7):496-501; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn104
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/7/496    most recent
kqn104v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorahan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sorahan, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Bladder cancer risks in workers manufacturing chemicals for the rubber industry

Tom Sorahan

Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Aim To investigate bladder cancer risks in workers from a factory manufacturing chemicals for the rubber industry.

Methods The mortality (1955–2005) and cancer morbidity experience (1971–2005) of a cohort of 2160 male production workers from a chemical factory in north Wales were investigated. Exposure estimates (or surrogates) were developed for four chemicals: 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), aniline, phenyl-β-naphthylamine (PBN) and ortho-toluidine. Two analytical approaches were used, indirect standardization and Poisson regression.

Results Based on mortality rates for the general population, there was a statistically significant (P < 0.01) excess mortality from bladder cancer in the 611 study subjects potentially exposed to one or more of the four chemicals being investigated (observed 11, standardized mortality ratio 278, 95% confidence interval 139–497). There was no excess bladder cancer mortality in the remaining 1555 workers. A similar contrast was also shown for bladder cancer incidence. There were 56 study subjects who had suffered from bladder cancer (malignant or benign). In simultaneous analyses of the four exposure history variables, Poisson regression showed a significant positive trend for bladder cancer risk in relation to cumulative duration of employment in the ortho-toluidine department (P < 0.05) and non-significant positive trends in relation to cumulative duration of employment in the PBN department and to cumulative exposure to MBT.

Conclusions Some members of this cohort have suffered from occupational bladder cancer. Exposure to ortho-toluidine appears to be responsible for part of this excess and the manufacture of PBN and exposure to MBT may also have been involved.

Keywords      Aniline; cohort study; 2-mercaptobenzothiazole; occupational cancer; ortho-toluidine; phenyl-β-naphthylamine


Correspondence to: Tom Sorahan, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Tel: +44 121 414 3644; fax: +44 121 414 6217; e-mail: t.m.sorahan{at}bham.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T Sorahan
Cancer risks in chemical production workers exposed to 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2009; 66(4): 269 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.