Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on October 28, 2008
Occupational Medicine 2008 58(8):534-539; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn136
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/8/534    most recent
kqn136v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridger, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kilminster, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bridger, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kilminster, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Occupational stress and strain in the Royal Navy 2007

R. S. Bridger, K. Brasher, A. Dew and S. Kilminster

Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke PO12 2DL, UK

Background Previous surveys of psychological strain in the Naval Service (NS) have shown higher than expected levels of strain when compared to the general population.

Aim To repeat the survey last carried out in 2004 and to obtain further information on the nature of the occupational stressors associated with strain.

Methods General Health Questionnaire-12 strain rates and job/life stressors were measured using a Work and Well-Being Questionnaire. Models of strain were developed for male and female personnel in the Royal Navy (RN) and males in the Royal Marines (RM).

Results The response rate was 57%. The psychological strain rate was 31.5% overall. Personnel suffering from strain tended to be ‘overcommitted’ to work, had low levels of commitment to the NS and had suffered stressful life events (SLEs) in the previous 12 months. Strain rates declined with age and rank in males, but not in females. Strain was significantly positively correlated with levels of overcommitment, effort–reward imbalance (ERI), role conflict, work–family conflict, organizational commitment and exposure to SLEs. Models of strain in the males and females in the RN and in the RM accounted for between 37 and 44% of the variance in strain.

Conclusions The survey provides evidence for both the demand control and ERI models—components of these models contribute independently to strain. High levels of commitment to the organization were associated with lower strain and exposure to SLEs to higher strain.

Keywords      Occupational stress; overcommitment; Royal Navy; stressfull life events

Correspondence to: R. S. Bridger, Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke PO12 2DL, UK. Tel/fax: +44(0)2392 768220/504823; e-mail: hhfd{at}inm.mod.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.