Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on October 3, 2008
Occupational Medicine 2008 58(8):551-555; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn129
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/8/551    most recent
kqn129v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackie, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effective health surveillance for occupational asthma in motor vehicle repair

James Mackie

Grosvenor Health, Grosvenor House, Prospect Hill, Redditch B97 4DL, UK

Background Diisocyanates are the commonest reported cause of occupational asthma (OA) in the UK. Health surveillance should play an important part in the early detection of disease and the prevention of long-term morbidity.

Aim To assess the efficacy of a UK-wide health surveillance programme provided to the motor vehicle repair industry.

Methods Analysis of respiratory questionnaire and spirometry results during the period 1995–2000 and more detailed assessment of the outcome of cases suggestive of OA between 1998 and 2000.

Results Approximately 3700 employees underwent health surveillance each year. As a result, a number (27%) required further assessment; information on 92 employees who were referred to their general practitioner (GP) for further assessment was examined. Half of these employees subsequently failed to see their GP and of those referred to a specialist only 63% attended that appointment. Of the 20 employees who did see a specialist, nine (45%) were subsequently diagnosed as having OA due to isocyanates, indicating a mean annual incidence rate of 0.79 per 1000 workers identified by surveillance. A year after identification, five of the diagnosed employees were still working in the same job.

Conclusions Health surveillance is only one part of a process for identifying OA. In this programme, the high drop out rate of employees in the medical investigation process initiated by surveillance was a significant problem. Recommendations are suggested for the future operation of respiratory health surveillance programmes.

Keywords      Health surveillance; isocyanates; motor vehicle repair; occupational asthma


Correspondence to: James Mackie, Grosvenor Health, Grosvenor House, Prospect Hill, Redditch B97 4DL, UK. Tel: +44 845 260 0690; fax: +44 845 094 6513; e-mail: james.mackie{at}grosvenorhealth.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.