Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on May 29, 2009

Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/6/413    most recent
kqp081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Burge, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Burge, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

PEF analysis requiring shorter records for occupational asthma diagnosis

Vicky C. Moore1, Maritta S. Jaakkola2,3, Cedd B. S. G. Burge1, Charles F. Pantin4, Alastair S. Robertson1,2, Arun Dev Vellore1 and P. Sherwood Burge1,2

1 Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK
2 Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Respiratory Medicine Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
4 Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent, UK

Background The Oasys programme plots serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements and produces scores of the likelihood that the recordings demonstrate occupational asthma. We have previously shown that the area between the mean workday and rest day PEF curves [the area between the curves (ABC) score] has a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 100% when plotted from waking time using a cut-off score of 15 l/min/h.

Aims To investigate the minimum data requirements to maintain the sensitivity and specificity of the ABC score.

Methods A total of 196 sets of measurements from workers with occupational asthma confirmed by methods other than serial PEFs and 206 records from occupational and non-occupational asthmatics who were not at work at the time of PEF monitoring were analysed according to their mean number of readings per day. Measurements from work and rest days were sequentially removed separately and the ABC score calculated at each reduction. The sensitivity and specificity of the ABC score (using a cut-off of 15 l/min/h) was calculated for each duration.

Results Two-hourly measurements (~8 readings per day) with eight workdays and three rest days had 68% sensitivity and 91% specificity for occupational asthma diagnosis. As readings decreased to ≤4 readings per day, ≥15 workdays were required to provide a specificity above 90%.

Conclusions To be sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of occupational asthma, the ABC score requires 2-hourly PEF measurements on eight workdays and three rest days. This is a short assessment period that should improve patient compliance.

Keywords      Data quantity; Oasys; occupational asthma; peak expiratory flow


Correspondence to: Vicky C. Moore, Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK. Tel: +44 (0)121 424 2745; fax: +44 (0)121 772 4259; e-mail: vicky.c.moore{at}heartofengland.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.