Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on August 24, 2009
Occupational Medicine 2009 59(8):586-592; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/8/586    most recent
kqp121v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adeodu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Madan, I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adeodu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Madan, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Attitudes and barriers to evidence-based guidelines among UK occupational physicians

Adenrele Adeodu1, Raymond Agius2 and Ira Madan3

1 Occupational Health Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
2 Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3 Department of Occupational Medicine, Kings College, London, UK

Background The Faculty of Occupational Medicine and NHS Plus are working to increase the availability and uptake of evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) among occupational physicians in the UK. Physicians’ attitudes and beliefs may influence their uptake of EBG; additionally, there are barriers that may make physicians feel unable to practise evidence-based medicine (EBM).

Aims To determine the attitudes of occupational physicians in the UK towards EBG, what prevents them from practising EBM and their workplace Internet access.

Methods Self-administered questionnaires were posted to 357 physicians chosen randomly from the Society of Occupational Medicine membership list. Responders were stratified according to occupational medicine professional grade. The data were analysed using Cronbach's alpha, analysis of variance, chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results A total of 259 occupational physicians responded giving a response rate of 73%. The attitude questionnaire showed good reliability. Occupational medicine specialists were more positive towards EBG than general practitioners. Overall, the respondents were more positive towards EBG than physicians in previous studies. The most common barriers to practising EBM were lack of time and limited availability of guidelines. The majority of respondents had workplace Internet access.

Conclusions UK occupational physicians have a positive attitude towards EBG. However, this study has identified a need to make EBG more readily accessible to them. In addition, occupational physicians require adequate time to practise EBM in their daily work. Educational workshops should be developed to enhance their literature search techniques, critical appraisal skills and application of EBM in clinical practice. Online training programmes should be considered to take advantage of their Internet access.

Keywords      Attitudes; evidence-based guidelines; evidence-based medicine; occupational physicians


Correspondence to: Adenrele Adeodu, Occupational Health Department, Kingstor House, Derriford Hospital, Derriford Road, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK. Fax: +44 (0)1752 763589; e-mail: adeadeodu{at}btopenworld.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.