Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on August 24, 2009

Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp123
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/8/550    most recent
kqp123v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Perceptions of illness and their impact on sickness absence

Prosenjit Giri1,2, Jon Poole1, Peter Nightingale2 and Alastair Robertson2

1 Dudley Primary Care NHS Trust, Occupational Health Department, Cross Street, Dudley DY1 1RN, UK
2 University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Occupational Health Department, Woodlands Nurses Home, Raddlebarn Road, Birmingham B29 6JD, UK

Background A patient's perception of their illness can influence their coping ability, compliance with treatment and functional recovery. Psychological interventions to address negative beliefs may facilitate an earlier return to work.

Aims To compare perceptions of illness, fitness to return to work and time to return to work among employees with those of their occupational physicians (OPs).

Methods A cross-sectional study of employees off sick for >2 weeks, with the return to work date ascertained at 3 months. Employees and their OPs completed similar questionnaires that included the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire.

Results Of total, 84 employees (76% response rate) and nine OPs participated. Employees reported a greater impact on their life (P < 0.01), a longer duration of illness (P < 0.01), more symptoms (P < 0.01), more concern about their illness (P < 0.01), more emotional impact of their illness (P < 0.01) and that their illness was more serious (P < 0.01) than did the OPs. They attributed their illness to work more often than their OPs (P < 0.05) and predicted more accurately when they would be fit to return to work (P < 0.01). Employees who returned to work believed that their illness was shorter lasting (P < 0.01), more treatable (P < 0.01), more controllable (P < 0.05), less serious (P < 0.01), had less emotional impact (P < 0.01), perceived fewer symptoms (P < 0.05) and had less concern (P < 0.05) than those who failed to return to work.

Conclusions Employees had more negative perceptions about their illness than OPs. Positive perceptions were associated with an earlier return to work. Unhelpful negative beliefs about illness need to be addressed by OPs.

Keywords      Fitness for work; illness perception; return to work; sickness absence; vocational rehabilitation


Correspondence to: Prosenjit Giri, 1 Lancaster Walk, Worksop, S81 7NG, UK. Tel: +44 (0)114 271 5703; fax: +44 (0)114 271 4844; e-mail: prosenjitgiri{at}hotmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.