Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on September 21, 2009
Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp137
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grimsmo-Powney, H.
Right arrow Articles by Coggon, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grimsmo-Powney, H.
Right arrow Articles by Coggon, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Occupational health needs of commercial fishermen in South West England

Helen Grimsmo-Powney, E. Clare Harris, Isabel Reading and David Coggon

MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Background Work in commercial fishing is physically demanding and hazardous, but unlike merchant seamen, fishermen are not required to hold a certificate of medical fitness.

Aims To investigate the case for regulatory medical standards for commercial fishermen and to identify priorities for the prevention and management of occupational injuries at sea.

Methods We surveyed a convenience sample of fishermen at three major fishing ports in South West England using a standardized interview-administered questionnaire.

Results Interviews were completed by 210 (68%) of 307 fishermen approached. Over their careers, 56 subjects (27%) had been returned to shore as an emergency for medical reasons, a rate of 14.6 (95% confidence interval 11.5–18.2) per 1000 man-years. Most emergency evacuations were for acute injuries, and only five were for illness. A few participants suffered from chronic disease that would call into question their fitness to go to sea. Fifty-five fishermen had suffered injuries in the past 12 months, including 12 that had caused loss of more than 3 days from work. Subjects had self-stitched 4 of 15 reported hand lacerations, while others had been bound with ‘gaffer’ tape.

Conclusions Prevention of hand lacerations should be a high priority, with first-aid training and equipment for fishing crews to improve their care when prevention fails. No firm conclusions can be drawn about the value of regular medical screening for commercial fishermen, but such screening should be considered a lower priority than accident prevention.

Keywords      Evacuation; fishermen; health screening; injury; laceration

Correspondence to: David Coggon, MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. Tel: +44 2380 777624; fax: +44 2380 704021; e-mail: dnc{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.