Skip Navigation

Occupational Medicine 2005 55(2):128-130; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi027
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croft, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Quarrell, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Croft, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Quarrell, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Occupational Medicine, Vol. 55 No. 2 © Society of Occupational Medicine 2005; all rights reserved

Short Report

Direct health costs of occupationally acquired malaria in a military population in Europe*

Ashley M. Croft1, Chris R. Winfield2, Moira Horsfall2 and Michael A. Quarrell2

1 Headquarters British Forces Germany Health Service, Wegberg, 2 Headquarters British Forces Germany Secondary Healthcare, Bielefeld, Germany

Background We reviewed imported malaria cases in British troops stationed in Germany, to quantify the occupational health burden of malaria and audit the quality of local care.

Methods We used a capture–recapture technique to ascertain imported malaria infections acquired by our military population during a 2-year period of surveillance (2001 and 2002). We retrieved and analysed all hospital discharge summaries. We calculated direct treatment costs from bills raised by the admitting German hospitals.

Results Out of 24 600 British troops stationed in Germany, approximately 800 were occupationally exposed to malaria during 2001 and 800 during 2002. The mean duration of exposure was 1.5 months. All the occupational exposures in this period occurred during routine training exercises in the tropics and subtropics, or during short-term peacekeeping missions in endemic areas. There were three imported malaria cases in British soldiers during 2001 and 12 during 2002 (crude acquisition rates 3.75 and 15/1000). Two soldiers (one with Plasmodium vivax, the other with Plasmodium falciparum infection) required intensive hospital therapy. The median length of hospital inpatient stay was 7 days (for P. vivax infection) and 8.5 days (for P. falciparum). The direct treatment costs of the hospitalizations totalled {euro}27 760.

Conclusions Comparing crude acquisition rates, non-immune soldiers carrying out peacetime activities in endemic areas may be at around 2–10 times greater risk of acquiring malaria than civilian travellers to the tropics. All military branches are at some risk, and the Royal Engineers may be at an especially high risk of occupationally acquired malaria. Better prevention is mandatory.

Keywords      British Army; infection; malaria; mefloquine; military; Plasmodium falciparum

Correspondence to: Lt Col Ashley Croft RAMC, Director of Public Health, HQ BFG Health Service, Wegberg Hospital Complex, D-41179 Mönchengladbach, Germany.Email: bfghs.wegberg.dph{at}bfgnet.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.