Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on February 23, 2006
Occupational Medicine 2006 56(3):191-198; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqj030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/3/191    most recent
kqj030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaafsma, F.
Right arrow Articles by van Dijk, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaafsma, F.
Right arrow Articles by van Dijk, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Occupational physicians: what are their questions in daily practice? An observation study

Frederieke Schaafsma1, Carel Hulshof1, Angela de Boer1, Ralph Hackmann2, Nannette Roest3 and Frank van Dijk1

1 Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam-Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, PO Box 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DE, The Netherlands
2 Royal Netherlands Navy Occupational Health Service, PO Box 10.000, 1780 CA DenHelder, The Netherlands
3 ING Occupational Health and Safety Services, PO Box 1800, 1000 BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Background To enable occupational physicians (OPs) to make use of scientific information in the decision-making process, evidence-based occupational health practice is stimulated.

Aims To study the questions which arise in daily practice of OPs, and to evaluate the possible contribution of evidence-based medicine (EBM) strategies to answer these questions.

Methods Observation of 20 OPs during two consecutive half-day periods, followed by an interview to explore the topics that arose during the preceding period. The conscious or manifest and unconscious or latent questions by OPs were analysed, and the number of questions suitable for performing a search in scientific medical literature databases was assessed.

Results After 40 half-day periods, the OPs had asked 26 manifest questions and 348 latent questions; the latter were voiced during the interview. Of all the questions, 40% were clinical in nature and considered suitable for a literature search. The emphasis of these questions was on prognosis, susceptibility and diagnosis following individual consultations. A lack of time or ‘no necessity to look for an answer’ were the most important reasons for leaving the questions unanswered.

Conclusions OPs spontaneously formulated less than one question per working day. However, after an observation of their daily practice followed by an interview, many latent questions were formulated. A substantial number of these questions could be answered by EBM strategies. If OPs were encouraged more to improve the quality of their decision making, they might formulate more answerable questions and feel more inclined to search for answers.

Keywords      Evidence-based medicine; information demand; information need; occupational medicine; occupational physicians


Correspondence to: Frederieke Schaafsma, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam-Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, PO Box 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DE, The Netherlands. e-mail: f.g.schaafsma{at}amc.uva.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.