Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on February 1, 2007
Occupational Medicine 2007 57(3):203-209; doi:10.1093/occmed/kql180
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/3/203    most recent
kql180v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ide, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ide, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Hearing loss, accidents, near misses and job losses in firefighters

Christopher Ide

Salus Occupational Health & Safety, Centrum Park, Hagmill Road, Coatbridge ML5 4TD, UK

Background The hearing losses of workers exposed to occupational noise have been extensively documented, but no information exists on the level of hearing loss which results in job loss.

Aim To define levels of hearing loss associated with ill-health retirement (IHR), comparing them with existing standards and assessing the extent to which poor hearing contributes to accidents and near misses to assist the development of rational standards for retention.

Methods All UK local authority fire brigades were approached for information on IHRs due to audiological problems, accident/near-miss totals and the numbers thought to be due to poor hearing in a 60-month period beginning in 1997.

Results Only 15/59 (25%) of brigades provided all information requested, although 50 (85%) and 32 (52%) supplied medical and safety information, respectively, which was used for analysis. Of 3366 IHRs, 135 (4%) were due to audiological problems. When compared to a control group of firefighters of similar age, those taking IHR had worse mean and median hearing losses in all grouped frequencies in both ears than the controls, and this difference always reached statistical significance (P < 0.001), but there was considerable overlap in terms of range of hearing loss in each group. Only 41/31 274 (0.13%) of accidents/near misses reported were believed to result from hearing problems, and seven of these were related to device failure.

Conclusions Retention criteria based on audiometric grounds alone may result in unnecessary IHRs. Poor hearing is only responsible for a small proportion of accidents and near misses.

Keywords      Acoustic neuroma; deafness; ENT; local government; NIHL; noise induced hearing loss; occupational deafness; occupational noise

Correspondence to: Christopher Ide, Salus Occupational Health & Safety, Centrum Park, Hagmill Road, Coatbridge ML5 4TD, UK. Tel: +44 1236 438203; fax: +44 1236 438180; e-mail: christopher_ide{at}yahoo.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.