Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on April 11, 2007
Occupational Medicine 2007 57(4):284-289; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/4/284    most recent
kqm012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lander, L.
Right arrow Articles by House, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lander, L.
Right arrow Articles by House, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Nerve conduction studies and current perception thresholds in workers assessed for hand–arm vibration syndrome

Lina Lander1,2, Wendy Lou1 and Ron House1,3

1 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building I, Room 1418A, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3 Occupational and Environmental Health Clinic, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Background Workers exposed to hand–arm vibration are at risk of developing the neurological abnormalities of hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). The Stockholm classification of the neurological component of HAVS is based on history and physical examination. There is a need to determine the association between neurological tests and the Stockholm scale.

Aims The main objective of this study was to compare the Stockholm neurological scale and the results of current perception threshold (CPT) tests and nerve conduction studies (NCS).

Methods Detailed physical examinations were done on 162 subjects referred for HAVS assessment at a specialist occupational health clinic. All subjects had NCS and measurement of CPT. The Stockholm neurological classification was carried out blinded to the results of these neurological tests and compared to the test results.

Results The nerve conduction results indicated that median and ulnar neuropathies proximal to the hand are common in workers being assessed for HAVS. Digital sensory neuropathy was found in only one worker. Neither the nerve conduction results nor the current perception results had a strong association with the Stockholm neurological scale. Exposure to vibration in total hours was the main variable associated with the Stockholm neurological scale [right hand: OR 1.30, 95% CI (1.10–1.54); left hand: OR 1.18, 95% CI (1.0–1.39)].

Conclusion Workers being assessed for HAVS should have nerve conduction testing to detect neuropathies proximal to the hand. Quantitative sensory tests such as current perception measurement are insufficient for diagnostic purposes but may have a role in screening workers exposed to vibration.

Keywords      Current perception; HAVS; nerve conduction; neurological; vibration


Correspondence to: Ron House, Occupational and Environmental Health Clinic, St Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada. Tel: +1 416 864 5074; Fax: +1 416 864 5421; e-mail: houser{at}smh.toronto.on.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
J. J. Katims
Re: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) and current perception thresholds (CPT) in workers assessed for hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)
Occup. Med., March 1, 2008; 58(2): 147 - 147.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.