Skip Navigation


Occupational Medicine Advance Access originally published online on October 27, 2007
Occupational Medicine 2008 58(1):15-24; doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/15    most recent
kqm115v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niedhammer, I.
Right arrow Articles by David, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niedhammer, I.
Right arrow Articles by David, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Importance of psychosocial work factors on general health outcomes in the national French SUMER survey

Isabelle Niedhammer1,2, Jean-François Chastang1 and Simone David1

1 INSERM, U687-IFR69, Saint-Maurice, France
2 UCD School of Public Health & Population Science, University College Dublin, Ireland

Aim To examine the associations between psychosocial work factors and general health outcomes, taking into account other occupational risk factors, within the national French working population.

Methods The study was based on a large national sample of 24 486 women and men of the French working population who filled in a self-administered questionnaire in 2003 (response rate: 96.5%). Psychosocial work exposures included psychological demands, decision latitude, social support, workplace bullying and violence from the public. The three health indicators studied were self-reported health, long sickness absence (>8 days of absence) and work injury. Adjustment was made for covariates: age, occupation, work status, working hours, time schedules, physical, ergonomic, biological and chemical exposures. Men and women were studied separately.

Results Low levels of decision latitude, and of social support, and high psychological demands were found to be risk factors for poor self-reported health and long sickness absence. High demands were also found to be associated with work injury. Workplace bullying and/or violence from the public also increased the risk of poor health, long sickness absence and work injury.

Conclusion Psychosocial work factors were found to be strong risk factors for health outcomes; the results were unchanged after adjustment for other occupational risk factors. Preventive efforts should be intensified towards reducing these psychosocial work exposures.

Keywords      Psychosocial work factors; self-reported health; sickness absence; work injury; workplace bullying; workplace violence

Correspondence to: Isabelle Niedhammer, UCD School of Public Health & Population Science, Woodview House, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. e-mail: isabelle.niedhammer{at}st-maurice.inserm.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.