Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on June 22, 2006

Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kql054
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/6/426    most recent
kql054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamill, M.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamill, M.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Short Report

Incentives for voluntary HIV testing in NHS staff

M. Hamill 1 *, A. Copas 2, and S. M. Murphy 3

1 Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE, UK; The Mortimer Market Centre, Department of GU/HIV Medicine, London WC1E 6AU, UK
2 Department of Statistical Science & Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College, London WC1E 6AU, UK
3 Patrick Clements Clinic, Department of GU/HIV Medicine, Central Middlesex Hospital, NWLH NHS Trust, London NW10 7NS, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. Hamill, E-mail: matthewhamill{at}yahoo.co.uk


   Abstract

Background HIV seroprevalence is rising in the United Kingdom. While acceptability of HIV testing has been explored among many groups there is a paucity of data regarding voluntary HIV counselling and testing (VCT) among NHS staff.

Aims To understand the barriers to HIV testing among NHS employees. To observe how these may be overcome. To assess which factors would motivate staff to undergo VCT and which would be a disincentive.

Methods Completion of a cross-sectional anonymous postal questionnaire survey of new employees at a London district general hospital. Demographic and attitudinal factors were collected. Respondents were able to give multiple responses to questions regarding reasons for and against VCT. Those unable to communicate in English were excluded.

Results There was a 63% response rate; of 69 respondents, 76% were female, 72% had English as their first language and 30% self-identified as white British. Thirty-nine percent were nurses, 19% doctors and the remainder a variety of professions. Of these, 41% had had a previous HIV test; none were known positive. Sixty-two percent would consider future testing. The commonest reasons to consider testing were knowledge of status (79%), treatment benefit (40%) and to inform family members (44%). The commonest reasons not to test were already tested negative (30%) and rather not know (26%).

Conclusions Since the NHS is recruiting staff from areas of high HIV prevalence, VCT should be encouraged. NHS staff require information on how to access testing as well as the benefits of early detection of blood-borne viruses.

Keywords: Blood-borne viruses; health care workers; HIV; testing; VCT.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.