Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on December 6, 2006

Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kql141
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/2/104    most recent
kql141v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ashcroft, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ashcroft, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of sensorineural symptoms between UK orthopaedic surgeons and gynaecologists

SC Roberts1, K Harrild2, J Mollison2, E Murphy3 and GP Ashcroft1

1 Department of Orthopaedics, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZB, UK
2 Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZB, UK
3 Department of Environmental & Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Liberty Safe Work Research Centre, Foresterhill Road, Aberdeen AB25 2ZB, UK

Background We have previously described significant differences in self-reported neurological symptoms of orthopaedic surgeons when compared to a group of gynaecologists. We suggested that this may be secondary to occupational sources of hand-transmitted vibration. The original study was intentionally brief and failed to address potential confounders.

Aims To compare the prevalence of sensorineural symptoms between UK orthopaedic surgeons and gynaecologists and adjust for potential confounding factors.

Methods Postal questionnaires were sent to 2040 members of the British Orthopaedic Association and 1797 members of the Royal College of Gynaecologists requesting information about demographics and self-reported neurological symptoms. Demographics of the orthopaedic surgeons and gynaecologists were compared using chi-squared tests and independent t-tests. Multiple logistic regressions were carried out to compare the prevalence of symptoms while adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Results Differences in the demographic profile of the orthopaedic surgeons and gynaecologists were identified: orthopaedic surgeons were predominantly male, were more junior in grade, were younger, used double gloving more often, had larger glove size, were more likely to be ambidextrous, to use vibrating tools outside of work and to consume greater amounts of alcohol. Orthopaedic surgeons reported a higher prevalence of tingling and numbness of fingers while at work and at other times. These differences were significant even after adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Conclusion Observed differences could be related to exposure to hand-transmitted vibration at work. Further assessment of risk to orthopaedic surgeons from hand-held power tools used in the course of their work is recommended.

Keywords      Hand-transmitted vibration; occupational health; orthopaedic surgeons; power tools; sensorineural symptoms; upper limb


Correspondence to: S. C. Roberts, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZB, UK. Tel: +44 1224 553004; fax: +44 1224 555199; e-mail: sam.roberts{at}doctors.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.