Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on July 25, 2007

Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/7/492    most recent
kqm064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Receptionists' perceptions of violence in general practice

Patricia A. Bayman and Tok Hussain

Mediscreen, Pennine Acute NHS Trust, HQ, Westhulme Avenue, Manchester, Oldham OL1 2PN, UK

Background Violence and threatening behaviour towards health care employees is a recognized hazard. There is a lack of research into the perceptions of general practice (GP) receptionists about this important workplace hazard.

Aim To determine the factors that influence reception staff perceptions regarding the risk of future violent and threatening incidents at work.

Methods A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered postal questionnaire was carried out among reception staff working in 49 GPs in two UK National Health Service Primary Care Trusts.

Results Forty-nine (72%) practices agreed to participate. Two hundred and seven (68%) reception staff participated. Receptionists who reported having been threatened or attacked in the past 12 months were more likely to be worried about being threatened [odds ratio (OR) 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0–11.8] or attacked (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.8–11.2) in the future. Receptionists with higher neuroticism scores were more worried about the future possibility of violence. Staff who felt safe and supported at work (P = 0.003) and staff who had lower background sources of stress at work (P < 0.001) were less likely to feel they would be threatened or attacked at work. Staff who had received training about violent and abusive incidents felt safer at work (OR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.04–1.55).

Conclusion Previous episodes of threats or attacks at work make receptionists more worried about future episodes. Factors which reduce reception staff anxieties about violence and threat at work are working in a supportive environment where work stressors are controlled and receiving training on how to deal with violent, threatening and difficult behaviour.

Keywords      Aggression; general practice; occupation; occupational; receptionist; self-reported; violence; workplace stress


Correspondence to: Patricia A Bayman, Mediscreen, Pennine Acute NHS Trust, HQ, Westhulme Avenue, Oldham OL1 2PN, UK. Tel: +44 161 627 8093; fax: +44 161 627 8287; e-mail: patbayman{at}aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.