Skip Navigation



Occupational Medicine Advance Access published online on January 18, 2008

Occupational Medicine, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
58/2/83    most recent
kqm151v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kok, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Dijk, F. J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kok, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Dijk, F. J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Evaluation of a workshop on evidence-based medicine for social insurance physicians

Rob Kok1,2, Jan L. Hoving1,2, Jos H. Verbeek2,3, Frederieke G. Schaafsma2, Paul B. A. Smits2 and Frank J. H. van Dijk1,2

1 Research Center for Insurance Medicine AMC-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Knowledge Transfer Team, Kuopio, Finland

Background Evidence-based medicine (EBM), a comprehensive method to support clinical decision making by using evidence, has been instrumental in clinical specialties but not yet in insurance medicine.

Aims We developed and evaluated a workshop on EBM for Dutch social insurance physicians who perform disability evaluations.

Methods Sixty-six social insurance physicians followed a 1-day introductory workshop that focused on teaching two EBM core skills: to ask answerable questions and to search for the best evidence. All outcomes were measured before, immediately after and 3 months after the workshop by means of self-assessment. The primary outcomes were knowledge, skills, attitude and intention to apply EBM in practice. The secondary outcomes were social influence, self-efficacy and behaviour.

Results Immediately after the workshop, a marked and significant improvement was seen in self-assessed skills (mean difference 4.2, 95% CI 3.7–4.6) and in self-efficacy to apply EBM (mean difference 0.7, 95% CI 0.6–0.8). For attitude, knowledge and intention, the improvements were small. Three months after the workshop, the improvements in skills (mean difference 2.3, 95% CI 1.8–2.9) and self-efficacy (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.6) remained significant.

Conclusions The workshop improved self-assessed EBM skills and self-efficacy both in the short and long term. The workshop also resulted in limited short-term improvements in self-assessed knowledge and in the intention to apply EBM in practice. The EBM approach can be successfully taught to social insurance physicians working in the field of disability evaluation.

Keywords      Continuous medical education; disability evaluation; disability [MeSH]; education (MeSH); evidence-based medicine; insurance medicine; postgraduate education


Correspondence to: Rob Kok, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 20 56 639 03; fax: +31 20 56 692 88; e-mail: r.kok{at}amc.uva.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.